Wednesday, October 11, 2006

VD(J) is the Antichrist

This morning VD the Betty Bowers of Springfield, got all pissy at a caller who asked him who he should judge when his much beloved Bible when it comes to politics, but totally ignored bible in his life says, judge not.

VD demanded to know where the bible said that! Damn you for making me, the manly manly-woman, look like a fool.

So VD dust off your holy word and read this:


Matthew 7:1
Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Luke 6:37
Judge not, and ye shall not be judged.
Romans 2:1
Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.
James 4:12
Who art thou that judgest another?


But VD says he needs to inspect some fruits. As in, by thier fruits ....

HAHAHAHA .. lawdy .... make him stop ... please ... I can't get my breath.... I'm turning blue......

Since shimmy-shimmy ko-ko pouf decided not to include this tidbit in his podcast, I will let you listen to it HERE ...

20 Comments:

Blogger Jacke M. said...

If a fruit falls in the forest and VDJ is sitting in his studio behind his microphone, did the fruit make any noise...? ;)

12:09 AM, October 12, 2006  
Anonymous Miss Prim said...

Once again when I tried to listen to this tidbit, it was unavailable on the podcast. Why is it that whenever something is particularly juicy, that segment is "accidentally" replaced by a previous day's broadcast?

By the way, I very much love your comments about VD(J). They brighten my day! He's such a jerk and sometimes I feel that not enough people understand how unique he truly is. He has got to be the most arrogant #$%@#$% I have ever heard on radio (and I am not young). He has often referred to people with whom he disagrees as "not the brightest bulb" (e.g. Tim Russert)but I fail to see much intelligence from him, despite the fact that he repeatedly states that he is very intelligent. He usually cannot express his opinion about something until he hears one from someone else that strikes his fancy and then he adopts it as his own. I notice in his recent commercials he has quit using Charles Osgood's line "I'll see you on the radio" and replaced it with "You'll hear me on the radio." Maybe he can also find a replacement for "the fetching Mrs. Jericho" stolen from Hugh Hewitt. Does he have an original thought in his head?

9:40 AM, October 12, 2006  
Blogger John Stone said...

Miss Prim ... well, as the churchlady says, Isn't *THAT* special?

Too bad for VD(J) because I *DO* have it recorded.

In fact, I will add it onto this blog sometime today so everyone can hear it.

And the best part of today's shitcast? He went to Apple Butter Days in Mt. Vernon -- undercover. Someone asked him if he didn't want to set up a booth and meet and greet at next year's celebration. He was not wildly enthusiastic about that.

Too bad he didn't run into Mr. Mt Vernon, so that he could "look him in the eye" and set up a date for that match he promised and then forgot.

Chickenshit....

10:32 AM, October 12, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I believe what Mr. Jericho was doing is in fact scriptural.

I Corinthians5:12
What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? 13God will judge those outside. "Expel the wicked man from among you."[b]

He was talking about phony Christians not bearing fruit. Christ himself said a fig tree with no fruit will be torn out and burned.

Why are you people debating something you don't understand? Your hatred only harms you.

1 Corinthians 6
Lawsuits among Believers
1If any of you has a dispute with another, dare he take it before the ungodly for judgment instead of before the saints? 2Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? 3Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life! 4Therefore, if you have disputes about such matters, appoint as judges even men of little account in the church![a] 5I say this to shame you. Is it possible that there is nobody among you wise enough to judge a dispute between believers? 6But instead, one brother goes to law against another—and this in front of unbelievers!
7The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already. Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be cheated? 8Instead, you yourselves cheat and do wrong, and you do this to your brothers.

9Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.


Judge not lest ye be judged speaks in absolutes and is point out the ultimate authority of God and his and only his ability to make final judgment heaven/hell.

The Bible says not to cast your pearls before swine but if even one might hear please know Jesus Christ is the only way to salvation. His way leads to eternal life. I really do not worry about the vitriol to follow this post but if you are that one person, Jesus was beaten, bled, died on a cross and paid the ultimate price so as to provide a way for you to have everlasting life. You don't have to earn it, just invite him into your life; it's a gift, free and forever.

1 Timothy 4
Instructions to Timothy
1The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons.

3:10 PM, October 12, 2006  
Blogger John Stone said...

Thank you for your input shimmy-shimmy ko-ko-pouf.

Arn't you glad someone is keeping track when you forget to podcast part of your show?

6:01 PM, October 12, 2006  
Blogger Jacke M. said...

The funny thing is that I agree with you on one level that VDJ is a bit judgmental of his fellow Christian brothers and sisters and don't mind saying so, primarily because he cannot know what people do and just because their fruit may not be visible to HIM doesn't mean there is no fruit...BUT, anon. has a strong point and aren't you and your friend, Miss Prim, being as harshly judgemental of Mr. Jericho in your further comments and why? Because you perceive HIM as judgemental.

Please tell me who is allowed to be judgemental and who is not? I'm not getting it because you don't like it when Jericho does it but then you engage in it yourself? Where's the consistency in you own position?

I think there's a word for that but it's slipping my mind at the moment.

12:35 AM, October 13, 2006  
Blogger John Stone said...

Well, Jackie there is a very simple answer to that. I don't claim to be a Xtian. I am not Hindu either so I eat hamburger. I'm not Jewish and so enjoy Lasagna.

My diety, who happens to be the Flying Spaghetti Monster (www.venganza.org) tells me that I can be as judgmental and kick the shit out of VD(J) whenever I want to do it.

1:51 AM, October 13, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So how exactly did Jericho go to Apple Butter Makin Days when it doesn't begin until Friday, October 13th? Does Vince now claim he can travel to the future?

2:20 AM, October 13, 2006  
Blogger John Stone said...

HAHAHA ...Anon 220 ... that is very, very funny. I am sure that he said that he was there incognito, and I am equally sure he said last weekend ... but I can go back to the recording to make sure.

Now that we know he loves it so, and that it is this weekend, perhaps Mr. Mt. Vernon can run into him there. He's easy to spot. Just look for a huge quaking girly-man pile of jello walking around the square.

3:14 AM, October 13, 2006  
Anonymous sgfcards said...

I almost feel bad making fun of him, since I think he is actually mentally challenged. Ok, I take that back -- I don't feel bad.

Did you hear him this morning making up a story about an enchanted, ugly alligator village? I'm all for using symbolism, but his attempt was just extremely stupid. It went on for 10 minutes... seriously, someone should help this dude (dudette?). I think he needs an intervention.

9:06 AM, October 13, 2006  
Anonymous Desdinova the Eternal Light said...

I've been told he once spent 30 minutes talking about ME. I think he is secretly in love with me, he just won't admit it.

9:30 AM, October 13, 2006  
Blogger Jacke M. said...

Oh, I see, you get to do all the things you despise when done by Christians cuz you don't have to answer to anyone and it isn't wrong for you...that old double standard thing. Gotcha.

I suppose you think because Christians at least TRY to make an effort to live a moral life that it makes them hypocritical when they mess up...if a "librul" does immoral things it's okay because they weren't trying to be moral in the first place, oh yeah, and Conservative Christians will be voting for Dems or staying home because it is now so OBVIOUS that the Democrat party is now the party of morality...uh huh, and HA HA! ;)

1:39 PM, October 13, 2006  
Blogger John Stone said...

Jacke - first, sorry for misspelling your name -- as 417Punt-it has pointed out spelling is not my strong suit --

Naw ... I have a single standard ... not a double one.

Mine

The Flying Spaghetti Monster is not real big on rules and regulations and all that stuff, and since he is not multihanded and doesn't have a backbone, he has a lot of trouble writing things down. He does follow Xtians like the Pfat Pfool Pfalwell though, in that he accepts donations gladly. He needs to get around to setting up a 501(c)3, but is pretty busy taking care of us Pastafarians.

When I compare a hummer with Monica, to a pedophile, I vote for the hummer as being more moral.

1:57 PM, October 13, 2006  
Blogger Jacke M. said...

Fair enough on the "Flying Spaghetti Monster" thang.

I do see a major difference between Bill's reaction to getting caught with his pants down and Foley, however. Thus far Foley hasn't perjured himself. ;)

3:30 PM, October 13, 2006  
Blogger John Stone said...

Jacke ... that's one of the many attempts at spinning this thing -- none of them are working -- the spin machine has run out of gas. Did you hear Keith Oberman last night?

That is not as bad a spin attempt as Drudge blaming those oversexed kids ... but, it's edging up to that point.

Getting a hummer by your girlfriend and then dissemilating about it and having a $70 million investigation, impeachment, and attempted conviction, just doesn't come up to the level of child abuse, or the cover-up of child abuse, just so a political party can stay in power in my mind ... but call us Pastafarians Old-Fashioned and Quaint.

3:51 PM, October 13, 2006  
Blogger Jacke M. said...

Please, do share the long list of Republicans who have defended Foley, who pleaded his cause and discouraged him from resigning.

The difference between Democrats and Republicans, more often than not, is that Republicans do tend to accept responsibility for their mistakes and when their sins are hidden, as in the case of Foley, and later come to light they generally tend to be ashamed of themselves. Not so with Democrats. You have Congressman William Jefferson, caught red-handed with $90,000.00 wrapped in $10,000.00 increments in a freezer in his office...and what has been the cry of the morally outraged Democrats? Try an endorsement by recently re-elected Mayor Ray Nagin, known for letting how many school buses sit and flood out post Katrina when the Mayor was authorized to use them for evacuations long before the arrival of Katrina? It seems he failed to do his homework and didn't even know he was authorized to use them.

Then, you have Studds, were you and the Democrat party so concerned about "our children" when Studds whisked one of them away to another country to have his way with him? No, as a matter of fact he was re-elected.

Do you want me to touch on Ted Kennedy? I think you can imagine what I'd have to say about that.

Now, none of these things in any way excuse the behavior of Foley, Foley's behavior was reprehensible and there is no excusing it, but if you will notice no one HAS excused it.

Where the problem, in partisan politics enters the discussion is when Democrats, whose majority supports abortion, supports gay marriage and wants to socialize health care which will greatly reduce the quality and accessiblity of health care...(you get the drift, and do consider Jefferson, Studds and Kennedy as mentioned previously) wags their fingers in the faces of Republicans as if they hold some sort of moral high ground. You've got to be kidding me!!! LMBO!!!

I think I hear a bowl of spaghettios calling you now, Mr. Pastafarian. Eat and dream of a Democrat majority in November. :)

8:38 PM, October 13, 2006  
Blogger John Stone said...

"Eat and dream of a Democrat majority in November."

Since I am not the 417 Punt-it I won't criticise the obvious typo you made above. And that you really meant ... of *THE* Democratic majority..."

And my answer is:

Yep

11:35 AM, October 14, 2006  
Blogger Jacke M. said...

It wasn't a typo. :)

...and I'm not the 417 Punt-it either, so I won't point out that you likely meant *criticize* when you wrote "criticise." ;)

2:02 PM, October 14, 2006  
Blogger John Stone said...

Ouch!!!

I fall on my sword at that ripost ....

4:03 PM, October 14, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf/rwp/RWP06-011

11:23 AM, November 15, 2006  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

<